Henrik Carlsson's Blog

All things me.

posted this note on and tagged it with Books Different Seasons Reading Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption Stephen King

After finishing 2001 yesterday, I needed to start a new audiobook on my commute. I didn’t want to spend to much time choosing so I scrolled through the downloaded books on Prologue and ended up glancing on Stephen King’s Different Seasons, so I started Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption.

I’ve watched the film version multiple times, but I’ve never read the ”short story” before. It hooked me right away so I’m already an hour and a halt into it.

posted this note on and tagged it with 2001 A Space Odyssey Arthur C Clarke Books Reading

Yesterday evening, after blogging about reading it, I finished 2001: A Space Odyssey and I really, really liked it. From what I’ve understood it has gotten some (maybe even a lot of) critique over the years for spelling things out in the ending part, rather than being artfully vague like Kubrick’s film. Personally, I prefer the spelled out version.

Keep in mind, it’s been at least ten years since the one and only time that I watched the movie so I’m working from old memories here. However, I do remember not ”getting it” in the end. Now, it’s perfectly fine to make a movie that not everybody ”gets”. It’s even okay to make a movie that you are not supposed to get.1 But 2001 seems like a movie that has a clear narrative, but then decides to make the ending abstract even though nothing up until that point has been like that.

By contrast, by spelling things out the book can focus on the ideas and present them in a clear way.


  1. David Lynch’s approach to movie-making comes to mind. Like Mullholland Drive

Replies and comments

posted this note on and tagged it with 2001 A Space Odyssey Books Reading The End of the World as We Know It

After bailing on Frank Herbert’s Dune I’ve dipped in and out of a few books. First, I gave ”Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” a go. Maybe it’s the audiobook’s fault, maybe it’s mine but I just couldn’t stand it for more than fifteen minutes. So instead I jumped into The End of the World as We Know It: New Tales of Stephen King’s The Stand, an anthology telling stories about the world of Stephen King’s The Stand. This was much more my cup of tea, but about half (maybe) into the third short-story I lost steam and I took a break. That break has lasted for a month or so now.

A week or so ago I started Arthus C. Clarke’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. Now this is absolutely my cup of tea! I watched Kubrick’s movie many years ago and it is a classic for a reason. That being said, I think I’m one of the weird people who like the novel better.1 The story is fascinating even though I know where it will all end up. It’s got just the right amount of details to keep the nerd inside me interesting, while not getting bogged down in endless regressions on orbital mechanics2. It also feels quite relevant again as our interest in space travel are increasing again, at the same time as the current fixation on AI.

The format of the audiobook also fits my life perfect right now. A single chapter is never longer than fifteen minutes, which happens to be the length of my commute to work. When they’re significantly shorter than that, two usually adds upp to no more than fifteen as well making it perfect for listening to while driving to work.


  1. Thereby making Kubrick movies and their novels a two for two in favor of the novels for me 
  2. I love your writing, Neal Stephenson, but if I’m not in the right mood your books can be a bit tedious. 

Replies and comments

posted this note on and tagged it with Books Neal Stephenson Reading Termination Shock

I took a break from King after ”The Langoliers” and instead dove into Neal Stephenson’s ”Termination Shock” and it grabbed me instantly. What a thrill ride thus far!

posted this note on and tagged it with Books Four Past Midnight Reading Stephen King The Langoliers

I finished the audiobook of Stephen King’s ”The Langoliers” from Four Past Midnight the other day. I really liked it!

I remember watching the tv movie (tv show?) of this story in class back in high school but I remembered very few things about it. I remembered the main premise, Dinah, and how terrible the langoliers looked, but apart from that I didn’t remember any of the other characters or the plot.

It’s a fun premise and engaging characters. The audiobook is read by Willem Dafoe who’s clearly having a lot of fun.

posted this on and tagged it with Reading

I did read a couple of pages in bed last night. I wonder, and hope, that I can keep the habit of reading more once the vacation ends as well.

posted this note on and tagged it with Handwritten Photo Reading snapshots Stand By Me Stephen King The Body

Sitting on the deck out in the backyard. The family is asleep and I’m slightly drunk on bourbon. Doing some writing with an actual pen & paper and reading Stephen King’s ”The Body”.1

Life ain’t too bad at the moment.

My POV on the deck. Book in hand.

  1. Yes, actual reading. Not listening to an audiobook. 

Seveneves

posted this article on and tagged it with Neal Stephenson Reading Seveneves

I’m currently relistening1 to Neal Stephenson’s Seveneves and just like the first time around I really like it. I have been falling behind on books lately but this past weekend I felt like listening to something and I was completely burnt out on podcasts so I decided to go back to this one. It’s so grand in scope and such a thrill-ride and then parts of it is, despite it’s dire subject matter, sort of a cozy book to me. Yes, the situations the characters are in are terrible and they have to make some tough choices but is competent people making the best out of their situation, solving problems as they come up. That is apparently something that really speaks to me.

I started listening on Saturday and today (Wednesday) I finished part two of the book. Oh, speaking of nothing in particular in the book, this post will be full of spoilers for the book. The intended reader is somebody who has read the book, or who doesn’t give a shit about being spoiled. Alright, moving on.

As I was saying, I finished part two of three today and I haven’t started on part three yet, so anything I write about ”5000 years later” will be based on my memory from my first time through the book. That being said, I think the first and the third part are the best ones. The second part drags from time to time.

Part One

The first part is just fantastic. The opening is great. I quoted and raved about the opening sentences on my first listen of it but it’s not just those lines. The first couple of chapters are amazing. It draws me in from the first sentence and then keeps it up, without it feeling ”cheap” like som page-turners can feel. The way the ending of one section can so nicely translate into the beginning of another, even thought the latter one is from the perspective of a different person and/or some time later gives it a really nice flow.

There’s also a clear way that things are heading. Maybe not as clear as a goal but at least I as the reader know that we are moving toward The White Sky and The Hard Rain and that everybody needs to to everything they can before those events.

Part Two

I’ve been thinking a lot about part two during this listen. I don’t really have a problem with long asides about orbital mechanics or other things. On the contrary actually, I love those asides in novels. So that’s not the problem with this part of the book.

Also in my mind, part one goes on up until Dinah telegraphs repeated ”QRT QRT QRT” to he father. To me, that’s where part one ends and part two begins.

I think the problem with part two is two-fold. It doesn’t have as clear of a narrative goal as part one. It feels like there’s a continuous struggle to get somewhere, but where that somewhere is isn’t quite clear. At times that makes it extra tense, which is good, but at other times it feels like it’s not really going anywhere.

The second problem is that it’s in part two that the main characters makes some really stupid decisions, decisions that feels out of character for them. For the first part of the novel people make the best they can out of a terrible situation, and they do it by making rational choices. Sometimes the choices are hard to make, but it’s still rational. In the second part, we have the situation with J B F.

When she shows up at the Cloud Ark, it’s in clear violation of the Crater Lake Accord. The clause about no world-leaders being allowed to be sent up seems like such an important one. Her role wasn’t to escape to orbit. Her role as president was to die with the people. Since she cowardly abandoned that, when she asked permission to come about Ivy should have declined. Yes, that’s grim, but so is nuking people the way J B F did, though given the circumstances, doing that was the right choice.

Failing to decline Julia, once she has been allowed to the Ark, once all hell has broken lose, and once Aïda is calling asking to get back to Endurance, the answer should once again have been no. She and the other’s chose to leave the Ark and to go on their own so F off and good luck.

Obviously I’m writing this with hind-sight but my memory is pretty clear on me feeling this on my first go through the book, when the situations first unfolded, as well.

And again failing that, once there on Cleft holding The Council of the Seven Eves, how, HOW can they allow Aïda and Julia to be part of the future of the human race. I get that killing them, a quarter of the human race at that point, would have been a really hard decision, but one that Tekla was ready to make. But they wouldn’t have had to do that. Let them live, but don’t assist them in having children. Particularly Aïda is so clear with her intentions, letting her build her own clan when the others could have just as easily refused her seems so illogical.

That being said, without these choices there wouldn’t have been a part three. And I love part three. Well, I loved it the first time around. Let’s find out tomorrow if I still do.


  1. I have a really hard time deciding whether I should call it listening or reading, when I’m not the one doing the actual reading of a book. 
posted this on and tagged it with It Reading Stephen King

Okay, the end part of The Ritual of Chud chapter in ”IT” was weird. It’s got to have been weird in the mid eighties as well, right?

posted this note on and tagged it with Reading Stephen King

I will finish IT within a few hours, and I’m four books deep into The Dark Tower. Where do I go next, The Shining or The Wolves of Calla?